University of Chicago's policy is more interesting: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/ai-strategy-statement

> During the 1L year, the value of effortful struggle, even with concepts that are second nature to experienced lawyers, is paramount.

I'm not Marxist but I support the class struggle. I certainly agree with the necessity of not allowing students to offload their cognition to AI tools.

But long term I think there is a great opportunity to leverage AI to be a huge benefit for everyone what is now mostly limited to the wealthiest students: a personal tutor. mathacademy.com is a fine template for this. Last year I used it to get back up to speed on high school math before teaching it. It's good at identifying weak points and generating the problems you need to understand. A few students I was able to work with on it got far fast. Others hit a wall. It requires a level of engagement that not all students can or want to sustain. But that's true of every approach.

Hopefully the AI backlash won't throw out the good with the bad.