| ▲ | theamk 9 hours ago | |
This is such a grand title, but the conclusions are surprisingly tame. - The take-home projects and papers are useless for grading purposes because of AI cheating. Time for more oral exams. Yep, the only real change from AI. This used to be $50/page from diploma mill and this was expensive enough to dissuade most people. Now it's almost free, and cheating is rampant. I think author's hope for oral exams is too optimistic, that is too expensive. Good old written exams, either in blue books or on special locked-down devices, proctored to prevent cheating, will be a way to go. - It makes no sense for professors to stand in front of large classes and deliver lectures. They should do small, interactive seminars. I don't see what this has to do with AI? Ever since VCR was invented, professors doing non-interactive lectures could be replaced with recordings. Either there is a "human element" in those, in which case it's still there, AI or not; or it's just pure information transfer, in which case AI is just an inferior version of recorded lecture with worse presentation style and hallucinations. - Professors should teach about AI, include how to prompt efficiently and how to critically scrutinize the output 100% agree, as with any important technology. But this is just a small curriculum change, just one more topic to cover in the lecture, and maybe a class. --- Overall, I believe that modern university is pretty bad and should be changed, but I hardly think that AI made this problem significantly worse, and this essay really did not convince me of that. | ||
| ▲ | evan_a_a 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
>>Professors should teach about AI, include how to prompt efficiently and how to critically scrutinize the output >100% agree, as with any important technology. But this is just a small curriculum change, just one more topic to cover in the lecture, and maybe a class. Critically scrutinizing LLM output is just critical thinking skills, something universities should already teach. | ||
| ▲ | dzhiurgis 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> I think author's hope for oral exams is too optimistic, that is too expensive. Ironically AI is perfect for quizzing you. | ||