| ▲ | randyrand an hour ago | |
No it would mean the license does not apply to the parts of code written by AI. | ||
| ▲ | Ekaros 7 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
I find it hard to find correct terminology in this case. AI generated content is copy right wise in state of nothingness. It simply does not have copy right status like other material can have. As such maybe best I can formulate is that you can't enforce license violations against ai generated material as you do not have ownership. So no license is enforceable with code written by AI. | ||
| ▲ | Joel_Mckay 11 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |
No, GPL is a contaminating license contract, so "AI" slop means you are probably in GPL violation by including isomorphic plagiarized uncopyrightable code. =3 | ||