| ▲ | greyface- 3 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> trespassed into a room A room with an unlocked and unmarked door, off of a hallway that was open to the general public. An INCREDIBLY tame act compared to other unprosecuted trespasses normalized and celebrated at https://hacks.mit.edu/. > rotated his MAC address Not a crime; in fact now a widespread and default practice for consumer Wi-Fi/Bluetooth devices. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | sillysaurusx 32 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I'm not sure if this is meant as some kind of "gotcha," but the legal system doesn't work that way. He wasn't rotating his MAC address as a default practice. He changed the last byte of his MAC only when he noticed he was banned from the network. Intent matters. Plugging your laptop into a router you normally don't have access to, with intent to download a large number of private articles, means something. And it means more than "I downloaded a lot of public files off the public internet," which is what Meta did. All of this is in the indictment, which is worth reading: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/217117-united-states... Personally I think it's a shame that digital crimes can result in prison time at all, except for e.g. crypto theft. But under US law, Aaron committed a crime back then, and it would still classify as a crime today. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | FireBeyond 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Were those hackers MIT students? Was Aaron? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||