| ▲ | danielvaughn 13 minutes ago | |
I see, thank you. So the difference in this case is that you're effectively writing very terse documentation. If I as a human interpreter want to understand why a range of code came into existence, I'm very unlikely to want to read another engineer's session. I'd have no way of knowing how far back into the session to read - some conversations can be very complicated. It also requires persisting everyone's sessions, which I'm sure is a pretty pricey problem. The truth is that for a given chat session, the messages themselves aren't extremely valuable, because they're part of the working development of the code. What I'm after is a condensed distillation of human intent using semi-formal symbolic language, which should be vastly easier to read and understand for engineers and teams. | ||