I like the "Claudish to English" name better.

https://github.com/gvzdv/claudish-to-english

That one is more specific, but "vomit" captures the feeling of Opus 5's writing very well for me. I don't know if it's the watermarking, but every single language idiosyncrasy that Opus 4.x (x > 5) had has been pushed up to 11 on Opus 5. Plus we got nouns verbing and seams seaming.

It's really unusable for anything other than code. And I have to remove its incomprehensible comments 50% of the time before committing anyway. After interacting with it, "slop vomit" is truly the most fitting description. I have to admit I have lost my temper and spontaneously referred to its output as vomit more than once. Seems like I'm not the only one.

▲

pickledish an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Word, that one also includes an example which is great, shows really clearly what the issue is for those who might be less familiar

	▲	unshavedyak 3 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		It's such a great example. It writes so well compared to Claude. I'd love to know what the hell Antrhopic has done to make Claude's writing so, so bad.