> But I still strongly believe the project makes a lot of sense, and I genuinely think these issues can be solved by 2028, if the project keeps its focus on stability instead of another SDK for SQL, web sockets, image compression, or whatever comes next

If you check the maintainer X, he's asking Claude for what features to implement next. Not only stabilizing isn't the priority, even the features implemented are random.

▲

andsoitis 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

> If you check the maintainer X, he's asking Claude for what features to implement next.

Link?

▲

tipiirai 3 days ago | parent [-]

> Link?

https://xcancel.com/jarredsumner/status/2089183223024943505

▲

andsoitis 3 days ago | parent [-]

Thanks. Seems pretty innocent to me.

	▲	owebmaster 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		What does innocent even mean in this context? I don't care if it's innocent. It is. Naivy too. But millions of people use the system and were expecting stability, not it to be a random AI experiment.

▲

locknitpicker 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

> If you check the maintainer X, he's asking Claude for what features to implement next. Not only stabilizing isn't the priority, even the features implemented are random.

To me that sort of stunt sounds like blatant attempts to distract the audience away from relevant topics.