Yeah, it's obvious enough on its own, but I'll add that Pangram also thinks it's 100% fully AI generated.

Hypocritical to say the least, given the message.

Pangram sucks

	▲	raincole 2 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Yeah because it makes people waste time double checking the most obvious cases (e.g. this article).
	▲	Nition 37 minutes ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		I've never seen a false positive from Pangram for human-written text of 300+ words.
	▲	41 minutes ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		[deleted]
	▲	redsocksfan45 7 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[dead]