If you want to make the argument that all cameras are problematic, I won't necessarily agree, but it's not the thing I'm asking about. One problem in these discussions is that it's virtually impossible to have a conversation or to explore the topic in any depth because every single comment on the thread is read purely as advocacy. I'm in some part responsible for getting the cameras pulled from my own municipality, as I've discussed many times here.

> If you want to make the argument that all cameras are problematic

Yes I think all cameras are problematic. I don't want to be recorded in public, especially by the state and it's commercial "partners". It's pretty wild that this is even up for debate at this point, scary times.

> I'm in some part responsible for getting the cameras pulled from my own municipality, as I've discussed many times here.

This along with the tone of your first comment comes more across as “Not in my backyard”.

I believe you and your follow up comments to the one earlier seemed to point that direction, but there is a bit of a tone in your first comment that could reasonably be misconstrued as undue skepticism in favor of flock.

I would just be mindful of how you talk about the subject, if you’re looking for feedback. If not, just ignore me I guess ha