What? I'd really like to know what you mean by both of these sentences.

>Very neurotypical coded article.

Does this mean that this article doesn't cater to those who are neurodivergent? It almost seems like this would be most valuable to those who aren't well equipped in social situations, like many neurodivergent people.

Are you referring to the way it is written? The subject matter? The specific recommendations?

>Many of these points are rather harsh and invalid.

I can kind of get invalid (I think it's best to assume each of these requires nuance and aren't universal rules you can blindly follow), but what about any of these are harsh?