| ▲ | 0xy 19 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The East Wing argument is such a weird hill to die on. Even Obama era staffers admitted it was embarrassing to welcome foreign dignitaries to a muddy patch of grass rather than a fit for purpose room. It's also majority private sector funded, and numerous admins have made substantial changes to the White House. Bush 2 and Obama made substantial renovations to the White House, as did Clinton. Trump has a massive and growing pile of rightful criticism and you're focusing on a project which costs 1/1,000th the cost of the Iran War and Obama staffers admit is necessary? Priorities? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Jtsummers 19 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The major issue with the East Wing was how it was done, not that it was done ("it": renovations in general, possibly even tear down and full rebuild). Also the costs have been ballooning and the "no taxpayer funding" claim turned out to be a lie. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Rapzid 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> It's also majority private sector funded See if you can spot the ethical problems and corruption in that. It's there, I promise you. Look hard. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | nielsbot 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Die on? It's absolutely a symbol of the incompetent, corrupt and destructive admin--it's not just the dollars. We should be very suspicions of the potential corruption caused by companies and individuals giving money to Trump's pet project. Finally, we can criticize multiple things at the same time. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | tekla 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> It's also majority private sector funded This is mostly a lie. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House_State_Ballroom#Fun... Vast majority is to be paid for by taxpayers. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | rhelz 19 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How embarrassing is it to welcome foreign dignitaries to a building which has been partially torn down? I man, if he actually had replaced it with a ballroom, that would be different. But that's not what we get from Trump. He can't even maintain a reflecting pool--we're not going to get a ballroom. No, he's going to leave the White house much worse than he found it. Which is his style. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||