Remix.run Logo
mort96 13 hours ago

I actually can't read this.

> The statement-list walk without the per-list pending-fiber flush

"Per-list pending-fiber flush?" Surely there's a clearer way to express this? Was it helpful necessary to describe "the statement-list walk" as a noun instead of talking about "walking the statement list"?

> A pure move: processStmtNodesInternalWithoutFlushingPendingFibers() becomes a delegating wrapper and the loop body is byte-identical

Did this need to be prefixed by "A pure move"? Why does the bytes of the text content of the loop body matter?

I found this too: https://github.com/phpstan/phpstan-src/commit/a9260cb3584854...

> Parked fibers are idle workers, not pending work - skipping their no-op fuel starves nothing.

"No-op fuel"? Really?

bakugo 12 hours ago | parent [-]

> I actually can't read this.

I don't think anyone can. At this point, I'm almost starting to believe it's an intentional move to discourage reviewing AI-generated commits by making them extremely unpleasant to read, in favor of just pushing straight to master without question.

whythismatters 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

>an intentional move

my own little conspiracy theory: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49247784

Bluestein 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Now that's a thought.-