I expect this to be automated too, and in the end boil down to paying for more tokens to fix the program.

Code too messy to be editable by an LLM is already too horrible for humans to touch. Fixing vibecoded software as a service will boil down to reverse-engineering requirements from the messed up program, and prompting a better model to design it properly and rewrite.

Eventually models will be trained to do this themselves, so it won't be a service you ask a dev for, it will be an extra charge on your AI subscription.

▲

qsera 4 hours ago | parent [-]

>Eventually models will be trained to do this themselves

That is what I wonder. Two things.

1. Is there enough training data in that format, to do it?

2. Is there enough incentive for the LLM companies to do it? I mean they got to charge the client for the tokens upto that point..so..

	▲	pornel 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		1. In "verifiable" domains ML is not limited by training data any more. Models can help generate the training data and/or learn the objective through reinforcement learning. 2. Yes, because the most capable model is the only one that can charge a premium. The rest is a commodity.