In case of ground invasion (or just to detect enemy drones in the sky) having access tonlots of cameras is of military use.

▲

rpdillon a day ago | parent | next [-]

Not a likely scenario, FWIW: https://www.military.com/history/5-reasons-why-geography-ame...

I would expect any invading forces would need to be surveilled by planes or satellites, or perhaps drones, since they would immediately destroy something like flock cameras.

	▲	__MatrixMan__ a day ago \| parent [-]
		You're assuming that the invaders can't just buy, hack, or social engineer, access to the cameras from Flock. Lately it has been social engineering: https://www.404media.co/floridas-wildlife-cops-are-searching... but there's also a concern that the cameras themselves have compromised supply chains and may serve other masters: https://www.404media.co/new-jersey-used-covid-relief-funds-t...

▲

perfectbeeing a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

In the case of Iran, having access to tonlots of cameras proved to be an incredible assets for a neighbor’s military.

▲

ModernMech a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What’s more likely is that an aspiring dictator illegally uses the military for domestic police operations, then military and police use is the same thing.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/cour...

▲

jonplackett a day ago | parent | prev [-]

I think you are just playing devil’s advocate.

	▲	a day ago \| parent [-]
		[deleted]