| ▲ | aleksandrm 4 hours ago |
| >Even if its proofread and factually correct it just comes across as cheap and low effort How so? |
|
| ▲ | layer8 29 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| Because it is cheap and low effort. |
|
| ▲ | Hendrikto 38 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It indicates that the author likes to take shortcuts and avoid work. |
|
| ▲ | Anoian 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| It just feels hollow and cheap. |
| |
| ▲ | karolist 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | The FAQ technique is LLM/SEO crumbs because people usually search for questions, if you have the exact likely question text that maps to user's search you're more likely to rank. It's unfortunate but it works, like open mouth YouTube thumbnails. | | |
| ▲ | ruszki 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | It’s still hollow and cheap. I closed those sites immediately even before LLMs. You need to pay me to waste my time, not the other way around. Even if that’s using your then not-so-free app. | | |
| ▲ | cpinto 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | That’s not feedback, just a non-constructive opinion. As someone else wrote above, if you’re so precious about it then help out the devs of the project and submit design PRs. | | |
| ▲ | asdfsa32 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | This is absurd. No one has an obligation to help anyone nor do they owe you any standard of help. Opinion on quality of output is constructive to the wise and an opportunity to scream "If you can do better than do it" for the small minded. |
|
|
|
|
