| ▲ | 999900000999 26 minutes ago | |||||||
They also have a much better safety net. Healthcare not being tied to employment is already massive. I think a flat tax + UBI is the only way to go. The dream of AI should be a society where maybe 10% of people have to work. The nightmare is if the other 90% still need work but can’t find it. | ||||||||
| ▲ | manlymuppet 7 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Yes to a stronger welfare state, including untying healthcare and employment, and a UBI (more specifically a negative income tax). But I think the nightmare you imagine is not realistic. There isn't a lump of labor. We shouldn't make policy decisions based on the assumption that the labor pool will be limited. | ||||||||
| ▲ | t-writescode 6 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Healthcare being tired to employment and related lacks of safety net are the only reason the most abusive companies (call centers, common retail experiences) have employees. We would do well to improve safety nets so that everyone benefits. | ||||||||
| ▲ | Retric 8 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Flat tax is only ever flat when you hold down deductions. That’s way harder than it seems. The corporate veil is extraordinarily valuable to the point where a minimum 10% tax on any money passing through options makes a lot of sense. However, the idea you can pass liability off for free is so pervasive you’d never get something like that to pass. | ||||||||
| ▲ | andsoitis 12 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
> the other 90% still need work but can’t find it. Where do all jobs come from? Ultimately they’re created by people, so I wouldn’t worry about there being a demand but no supply. | ||||||||
| ||||||||