> Is this really just a difference in inclination? It is not that I did not enjoy writing code, but rather that seeing what I want rendered on the screen brings me more joy.

I've been tinkering with things since a very young age, started learning about computers in middle school and really started with programming in college (I had the basics since high school, but I was interested more in 3D modeling). So writing code is more like tinkering for me and I don't really particularly care about the result other than making it happen (correctly). Once it's done, it's no longer a subject of intellectual interest.

So the joy of creating a program is in the creation itself. Once it's done I merely use it (or maintain it if it's part of the work).

I don't condemn AI use, even when doing vibe coding. My main issue is with the hypers stating that it's ok to lower a codebase quality or encouraging recklessness (and the dubious anecdotes) in a collaborative settings. If you can ensure quality and collaborate easily with your colleagues, go ahead. If you can't, then you shouldn't send PRs around.

> Thank you for always replying. Have a great day, and I hope this does not offend you in any way.

Have a great day too. I always appreciate the different point of views on a subject. It's a big world and everyone has their own perspectives.

>If you can't, then you shouldn't send PRs around.

I think this is exactly why our differences emerge.

I rarely collaborate with colleagues. In contract delivery work, that is simply how things operate. Usually, after the architecture is divided into modules, I take on the role of implementing one entire area from start to finish. Because of this, I actually have almost no experience with direct code level collaboration.

While multiple developers typically share a single code base and constantly exchange PRs, I take full responsibility for the internal implementation within the designed I/O interfaces, which seems to be where our divergence stems from.

When the modules are finally integrated, it only becomes a matter of accountability. In that sense, aside from my own website, I might not actually be doing any sustainable development. To be honest, as you know if you try AI vibe coding, the AI's abstraction and my abstraction are different. Because I am not used to its structure, it is not easy for me to manually fix the code generated by AI. Even if I do fix it, I mostly just tweak the surface level. In that regard, I completely agree that there are valid concerns regarding long term maintenance. However, since meeting strict deadlines and ensuring the required behavior are more important to me than long term maintainability, I tend to be more lenient toward AI generation.

It seems we reached different conclusions because we operate in completely different domains. It is always fascinating to see how perspectives differ depending on the field when having these conversations. Have a nice day.