Is it just me or is it bizarre that they're advertising old open-weight models.

GLM 4.7 (December 2025) not 5 (Feb) 5.1 (April) or 5.2 (June). 5.3 (4 days ago) is, to be fair, not open weights yet... but there's a lot since 4.7.

Kimi K2.7 (April) not K2.7-code (June) or K3 (July).

Gemma 4 (April), Llama (April), and gpt-oss (August 2025) are up to date, but old (for models).

Meanwhile the closed source GPT 5.6 sol is up to date (June)...

Should potential purchasers take away from this that they're not going to be able to run recent models unless they front the cost of developing software or something?

▲

eli 42 minutes ago | parent [-]

I think they run whatever models they get paid to run. But mostly from enterprise. They are clearly not interested in consumer dollars.

▲

gpm 37 minutes ago | parent [-]

I mean the product is a server rack and while there's no advertised price I would assume it's six figures. So yes, an enterprise product.

But even an enterprise is going to care about the difference between "we can run the model we want with support from the manufacturer" and "we have to purchase the product, and then spend another 6 figure sum having developers port a recent model to the product to use it".

▲

WarmWash 33 minutes ago | parent [-]

I feel like 6-figures would be the clearance price on it...

	▲	oceanplexian 6 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		6 figures is a single mid range Xeon or Epyc server these days.