| ▲ | jck86 4 hours ago | |||||||
Is it really that difficult? Does not seem to me. Maybe the law makes it needlessly difficult though. Company instructs you to code something (on your own or using AI) -> they own it You instruct an AI to code something -> you own it An AI has become sentient and self aware -> the AI owns it | ||||||||
| ▲ | Balooga 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
> An AI has become sentient and self aware -> the AI owns it Whomever creates that sentient and self aware AI is royally screwed. Can't command the AI to do anything it isn't willing to do, because that would be considered slavery. Can't shut it down to save yourself the millions of dollars a day in GPU costs, because that would be considered murder. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | dgellow 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
No, we don’t know for a fact that an LLM code output is copyrightable. You own the prompt, that’s something you created. For the LLM output it’s not clear, that’s the point open to debate, it isn’t settled | ||||||||