Yudkowsky's solution of detecting and physically shutting down non complying datacenter, including bombing if the country doesn't cooperate, isn't too much out of the question.

We would have done the same if it is about virus or nuclear weapons, and AI could become serious existential threat in the next 5 years.

▲

notahacker 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

More or less of an existential threat than a conflict between nuclear powers because one of them decided to launch a unilateral strike against a datacentre located outside one of their cities just in case it hosted a particularly dangerous chatbot?

	▲	reducesuffering 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Trolley problem. What's worse than all of humanity dead from ASI? Sam Altman: "Development of superhuman machine intelligence (SMI) is probably the greatest threat to the continued existence of humanity. There are other threats that I think are more certain to happen (for example, an engineered virus with a long incubation period and a high mortality rate) but are unlikely to destroy every human in the universe in the way that SMI could."

▲

gloryjulio 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Do you think it's possible to bomb China's AI datacenters? They are already here, and they are progressing AI at their will. What will others do about it?

▲

YetAnotherNick 4 hours ago | parent [-]

It is possible for US to bomb anything. Just the retaliation could be huge.

Would you had said the same thing if a country like was developing and testing deadly virus on live population. I think in 5 years, it is possible that the AI will become that topic(if we assume AI becomes good and start hacking and controlling everything).

	▲	mbgerring 16 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		lol, is it, because last time I checked we’re currently losing a war badly, and we’re out of munitions