| ▲ | numandina an hour ago |
| It's blowing my mind. Fable is the only AI model I use for coding, everything else is garbage for my use case. |
|
| ▲ | an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | dgabriel an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I'm curious about your specific use case, if you're comfortable sharing it here. |
| |
| ▲ | numandina 4 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Advanced mesh manipulation, shader writing and editing, 3D math, spatial awareness and analysis. It's not just better, it's the only model that straight up works (sorry for the claude speak). A league of its own. Don't take my word for it, use a simple prompt of "create a shader showing [complex scene]" and see what the other models vomit out, including opus 4.6/4.8/5 and 5.6 sol (compare fable low effort with sol xhigh). |
|
|
| ▲ | viccis an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Tbh the extreme discrepancies between very confidently made statements about "X is better than Y" a sign a to me this is something where peoples' biases are out of control. Not saying you are wrong. Just that these things are so hard to evaluated apples to apples and that things like under-the-hood routing changes muddy the waters so much that it's really hard to get reasonable assessments. |
| |
| ▲ | numandina a minute ago | parent [-] | | My tests are very visual based and easy to notice when the seed/temp or the routing comes into play. And it's been months of working with these models so comparison is straightforward and robust. Fable is the first time I can use AI to code with good results while everyone has been doing it for ages before me. |
|
