| ▲ | aaron_m04 13 hours ago |
| Or we could fly less. |
|
| ▲ | brookst 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Ok, say we somehow cut air travel by 50% overnight. Seems unlikely, but we did it. Would you advocate to not pursue this approach to mitigating the remaining 50%? |
| |
| ▲ | blondie9x 13 hours ago | parent [-] | | Check out other comment. It could actually end up causing more warming in the long term depending on the net change in fuel use or extra maintenance on plane etc. | | |
| ▲ | dabinat 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Isn’t that the purpose of running a study? To establish that a theory works and could be beneficial at scale? | |
| ▲ | teiferer 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The required changes are typically minimal. A little bit of altitude up or down, a minimal detour. Also mentioned in other comments (and in the article). |
|
|
|
| ▲ | blondie9x 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| This exactly. |
| |
