Exercise intensity modulates interorgan communication and is associated with

david-gpu 3 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

So many similar studies, including this one, suffer from the same flaws pointed out by Olympic coach Steve Magness.

In brief, the training protocols used in these papers are not representative at all of how actual athletes train. And athletes do not train that way because it doesn't work nearly as well as the training protocols that have become popular since the 1960s or so.

With this I am not trying to invalidate the research. What I am doing is warning laypeople from drawing overly simplistic conclusions from studies like these, such as concluding that "Exercising hard is good". Successful endurance athletes spend the overwhelming majority of their training at low and moderate intensities, because that is what works best in the long term.

▲

newsomix9xl 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Full title too long: Exercise intensity modulates interorgan communication and is associated with cardiometabolic health outcomes in humans

▲

majestik 34 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Exercising hard = good for health. News at 11.

	▲	jgrahamc 29 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Yeah. The formula isn't terribly complicated: don't eat crap and move your body in different ways. Despite doing exercise (including high intensity stuff like spin class) I was overweight and had a HOMA-IR of 3.8 (Moderate Insulin Resistance) and insulin 13.2 (Early Insulin Resistance). This was because I was addicted to sugary stuff. I cut my refined sugar intake to almost zero and in two months HOMA-IR went to 1.02 (Normal Range) and insulin to 4.9 (Optimal / Longevity Range). My triglycerides had peaked at 228 (Moderate Risk) and dropped to 96 (Normal/Good). Glucose went from 116 (Prediabetes) to 85 (Healthy). My assistant in cutting all that sugar was Claude. I used Claude as my buddy: I'd chat with Claude when I had cravings and it gave me alternatives and support. And it worked.