| ▲ | snapplebobapple 15 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
It would be more accurate to say "better investment opportunities bias investment away from the weak returns of allegedly clean energy" capital is not the bottleneck anymore than it has always been the bottleneck. Higher returning things to choose instead are the bottleneck | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | toomuchtodo 14 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Fossil fuels receive ~$7T in global subsidies per year, per the IMF, even when less cost efficient than renewables. Markets can remain irrational longer than you can stay solvent. It’s government’s job to step in and correct market failures, when appropriate, including mispricing of potential investments. https://www.imf.org/en/topics/climate-change/energy-subsidie... (the world has already deployed 3TW of solar, and is approaching 1TW/year deployment rate, so we’re almost to the tipping point where fossil fuel subsidies will no longer be relevant; until then, finger on the scale when needed) | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||