| ▲ | nish__ 15 hours ago | |||||||
At the end of the day, nothing beats hydro electric power. It's hidden, consistent and the technology is very mature. Really the OG of renewable energy. If we could get our appliances running efficiently enough, I think we could run the whole grid on it. | ||||||||
| ▲ | nickff 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Hydro power (dams) causes massive declines in native fish populations in the affected rivers, which is especially significant for salmonids. There have been attempts to mitigate these issues with 'fish ladders' (as well as more complicated schemes), but they haven't been very effective. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | igor47 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
One problem with hydro is we've long ago exhausted the easy wins, and then went on to build the kinda wash outs. See the fight over Glen canyon, which even its architect went on to admit was a mistake. The wins now are in closed loop pumped hydro; see https://www.volts.wtf/p/whats-the-deal-with-pumped-hydro | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | mwcremer 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Lakes Powell and Mead would like a word... | ||||||||
| ▲ | amazingamazing 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Huh? Solar has all of that and doesn't even have moving parts. The only arguable downside is it increases more sunlight absorbed by the earth (as opposed to reflecting it). You may say but what about nighttime - im talking about in aggregate on earth, just like hydro only works well with only water | ||||||||