| ▲ | Planktonne an hour ago | |
> are you disagreeing with them all Yes. I think an LLM can be useful for trivial or functional tasks, but for expressing complex positions, it's worse than useless. It's absolutely valid to dismiss LLM-generated prose, and people who who think they're doing 'assisted authorship' tend to be mistaken. I'm not saying you are incapable of thought; I'm saying that you've abdicated that by transmitting through an LLM. | ||
| ▲ | supermatt an hour ago | parent [-] | |
> Yes Well you are of course entitled to disagree. > I'm not saying you are incapable of thought; I'm saying that you've abdicated that by transmitting through an LLM. What you actually said was that I "didn't put any meaningful thought into it". Thats the INPUT, not OUTPUT. Anyway. I think we're as far as we are going to get with this "discussion". Have a good evening! | ||