| ▲ | OutOfHere 8 hours ago |
| The title looks to be misleading, since this price cut is limited to OpenRouter. It does not apply for the native OpenAI price listed at https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/gpt-5.6-sol |
|
| ▲ | jrflo 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Yes, and it's only for a month. This is an ad. |
|
| ▲ | user43928 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| OpenRouter and the Vercel AI Gateway. So yes, presumably a very small share of their total traffic. |
|
| ▲ | paxys 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Which raises the question - who is subsidizing this, and why? |
| |
| ▲ | internetter 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Possibly OAI? If you have OAI tokens you are a captive audience. If you have OpenRouter you are bidding on a free market. OpenRouter attributes this promotion to OpenAI https://x.com/OpenRouter/status/2089416739398254662 | | |
| ▲ | maxnevermind 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Why though, to AB test/see the impact of a price cut on a platform with multiple competitors? | |
| ▲ | paxys 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Is this captive audience not going to switch providers for a 50% discount? Especially when the effort is simply swapping one URL for another? |
| |
| ▲ | OutOfHere 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | OpenRouter is likely just leveraging Codex subscriptions. | | |
| ▲ | prime_ursid 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Wouldn’t that be against TOS? | | |
| ▲ | OutOfHere 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | It might be through a level of indirection via an intermediate provider, offloading the TOS issue to the intermediate provider who couldn't care less. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | matchagaucho 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Right? Should we switch from direct OpenAI API integration to OpenRouter? What's the incentive here? Open Responses API doesn't appear to support state management (yet) |
|
| ▲ | baimoqilin 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [dead] |