> which is barely any at all

Clearly you either didn't read it, misunderstood it, disbelieved it, or just DGAF :)

swatcoder an hour ago | parent | next [-]

What I read is that you're self-conscious about your writing style and that you find the LLM processed version of your own stream of thoughts to be helpful to you yourself.

Which is fine for you, but doesn't change that many people can get more insight out of your original text than they can out of the generated adaptation, and can do so with more interest and less fatigue.

And indeed, you don't have to care about that. But one would think that in publishing or sharing your writing at all, you do in fact have some investment in whether people receive those insights that you have. Otherwise, you could just keep the AI writings to yourself in the first place.

▲

minimaxir an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Many different people in this HN submission have given you similar feedback: given that, you should consider that your priors are not correct.

▲

qarl2 35 minutes ago | parent [-]

It could also be that this site has created its own hive-mind environment. Which is especially and bizzarely intolerant of AI at the moment.

I don't want the prompt - I may not have access to an LLM to evaluate it. The entire argument here is misguided, and deeply angry about AI.

It's equivalent to answering a question with "google it". Which is often times just plain rude.

	▲	Alpha3031 19 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		People having preferences different from you is not a hive mind.

▲

20 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

miyoji an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

No, I did read it, and I think I understood it. My summary in my own words is that you find that LLMs can massage your writing and reduce the stress of communication. Did I believe it? Well...

You have an account on HN dating back to 2013 with over 6000 comment karma, you clearly didn't have trouble communicating like a normal person for a decade on this website before the advent of LLMs. Your spelling and grammar in posts predating LLMs are also far better than what you've produced in this prompt, so I'm tempted to think that you're exaggerating your inability to communicate normally to make a point.

But even so, the original wall of text communicates the point much more strongly and sincerely than the LLM trash.

	▲	supermatt 39 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I haven't always struggled so much, but my ability to read has severely diminished over the past decade. I find it much easier to communicate in short form. It has always been disproportionately time-consuming for me to write though. It is the articulation of ideas that I struggle with and so I usually edit my comments multiple times. And to get rid of some of the more stupid stuff I say. To be fair, that word salad would read more like this comment if I gave it some time, but it would take many hours to produce a simple post with the same readability as the LLM.