| ▲ | Paracompact 21 hours ago | |
Yours instantly! 576 pages! It's so very clear why he thought it was a good idea to have a regex validator to check that he doesn't imply he still works at Github. "i dont work at github" "Yes, you're absolutely right. I apologize for the mistake and have edited the document accordingly. reads War and Peace system prompt Here is how we can programmatically and scientifically avoid this problem in the future: 1. Add to the regex validator library: We can add to the regex validator library an additional entry to catch any future instances of this mistake. This is a low-cost, high-yield approach---regex runs with deterministic and repeatable results, with the added benefit that its big-O runtime scales at most linearly with the size of the text for most use cases (Hartmann, 2018). *Three other braindead ideas* Which future-proofing strategy shall we take?" "sure 1" | ||