| ▲ | tptacek a day ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Europeans do pay much less (though: for roughly the same outcomes --- probably the same outcomes if you control for wild SES variance across the US). | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | scoofy a day ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Right… my exact point is that it’s not a like-for-like comparison. Take Europeans, put them in Kansas. Fund their healthcare as though they were in Europe, and watch their health outcomes take a nosedive because the environment here is non-trivially worse for you health. Unless I’m wildly misunderstanding these studies, it makes sense that we would need to spend more for the same outcomes because we are starting from a more unhealthy position, so the same results require more resources. We need to at least be controlling for the 10%+ differences in obesity rates, and the enormous differences in UV index. That’s before even considering weekly exercise minimums that most European get when just walking to a bar. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||