Remix.run Logo
tptacek a day ago

Europeans do pay much less (though: for roughly the same outcomes --- probably the same outcomes if you control for wild SES variance across the US).

scoofy a day ago | parent [-]

Right… my exact point is that it’s not a like-for-like comparison.

Take Europeans, put them in Kansas. Fund their healthcare as though they were in Europe, and watch their health outcomes take a nosedive because the environment here is non-trivially worse for you health.

Unless I’m wildly misunderstanding these studies, it makes sense that we would need to spend more for the same outcomes because we are starting from a more unhealthy position, so the same results require more resources.

We need to at least be controlling for the 10%+ differences in obesity rates, and the enormous differences in UV index. That’s before even considering weekly exercise minimums that most European get when just walking to a bar.

tomtheelder 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Then compare, say, Massachusetts to high functioning north Europe systems. You will shrink the lifestyle and climate factors down to a pretty minuscule difference, but you will still find that the spending is dramatically higher.

You're not wrong at all that the US has some systematic issues that place additional strain on the healthcare system, but it's a "yes and" situation here. Even accounting for those, we spend far, far too much because our system is extractive.

scoofy an hour ago | parent [-]

You could maybe compare the Boston metro. It should resemble a European city with satellite villages connected by trains.

I would be curious as to the costs/benefits there.

tptacek a day ago | parent | prev [-]

I don't think there's a whole lot to understand in this study; it's pretty wildly extrapolated and its savings numbers come from spherical-cow projections of what single-payer would actually do (somehow, it would drastically cut pay to doctors without chasing them all out of the field).

I think the important bit in all these discussions is that "universal health care" and "single payer" aren't synonyms. Single payer is one way to do universal, and most universal systems don't do it. But this article conflates the two.