| ▲ | whstl 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
There is a light at the end of the tunnel for all the minds burned out by AI slop. I already saw someone getting fired for only producing AI text as part of their entire output, after being unable to explain what they “wrote” in multiple situations. And recently my company enacted a mandate that text made for humans should not be AI generated. Sooner or later every company will start realizing that this is just people too lazy to actually work and coasting on a paycheck, at the expense of every other worker. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | rfff2 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Yup sooner or later the new heuristic will be quality of comms measured by how short a thing is rather than how long. Much how like essay's have a word limit - and people think you should max it out. We will go in the opposite direction - which I'll be glad about! | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | LPisGood 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
This makes me happy to hear that someone got fired for that, but I just cannot picture that happening at my organization. Perhaps standards are too low. What sort of thing did they get fired for? Was there some warning etc? | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ModernMech 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
But they got fired for not being able to explain it, not for using it. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||