If the argument is good enough, it worth ignoring who/what the author is.

If you can tell that it was a "what", it's not good enough.

	▲	quantummagic 12 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Why? An argument stands on its own, regardless of origin. If it's poorly written, by someone who is say a non-native speaker, it can still be a VALUABLE and VALID argument. It would be racist to dismiss an argument because it was poorly written by a non-native speaker. "Racism" against a computer is just as ignorant and petty.