The people who avoid care they need because they can't afford it are a very small portion of the population that gets an outsized share of attention on the issue.

Until public healthcare advocates understand this and make actual attempts to convince the majority of people who are satisfied with the current system that there are benefits, the status quo will remain.

▲

tmgldn a day ago | parent | next [-]

I'm not convinced that your assumption that they are a very small portion of the population holds up, but I only have the same anecdotal evidence you likely have.

	▲	bpt3 a day ago \| parent [-]
		Yes it's anecdotal for specific statements, but I'm roughly basing my statement on surveys like this one: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/poll-are-sati... I find it hard to believe that people who would like to seek care but are unable to do so because of limits on their existing coverage would say that they are satisfied with their medical insurance.

▲

expedition32 a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Half the population does not vote. This is the problem socialists have- how do you get the underclass to exercise their power against the bourgeois?

▲

bpt3 a day ago | parent [-]

No, the problem socialists have is that most people are smart enough to realize they won't be better off under a socialist regime, to the chagrin of the self-selected vanguard.

▲

_heimdall a day ago | parent [-]

I'm not sure most people can actually define socialism, let alone recognize it.

	▲	autoexec a day ago \| parent [-]
		Exactly. Although even if you can avoid the words they don't understand or were told to be frightened of you'd still have the problem of getting them to vote, even for policies they think would be good for them.