| ▲ | nxm a day ago | |
Do you have any more evidence than this anecdote - pretty much any specialist is available this week in my area. Did you check ZocDoc? | ||
| ▲ | ElProlactin a day ago | parent | next [-] | |
https://healthjournalism.org/blog/2024/08/in-the-u-s-wait-ti... https://www.chiefhealthcareexecutive.com/view/hoping-to-see-... ZocDoc isn't reflective of availability as a whole. It has a lot of depth in certain areas, like dentistry, dermatology, and primary care, and less in other specialties. Many of the providers are not physicians, they're NPs and PAs. Perfectly qualified for certain kinds of issues but not others. ZocDoc is also, obviously, working only with the providers who are willing to pay for new patients, such as newer practices trying to build a patient base. An established practice that is booked out for the next two months obviously isn't going to use such a service. Finally, you're not considering insurance and continuity of care. So yeah, in an urban area, you can probably find someone to see you sooner than later if they're in network or you can afford to pay, and you're okay with seeing someone you might never see again or with whom there might not be continuity of care. | ||
| ▲ | otterley a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
I'm a Kaiser member, so I have to use their providers. The same restriction would hold for any HMO that has a closed provider list. You should see how long their surgery departments are backed up! | ||
| ▲ | dpkirchner a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Are all of those specialists "in-network"? Have you tried contacting them to see if they truly have availability? It's common for providers (or the insurance carrier), at least in my area, to claim they take new patients when in fact they do not. (For those not in the know, out of network means costs to the patient are much higher). | ||