Different rules for the rulers and the proles has been a big part of life on Earth for eternity. Why shouldn't we be surprised that this judge thinks it's okay to do things that a grade schooler can't.

▲

freejazz a day ago | parent [-]

The way to challenge a judge's opinion is to appeal it, not personally sue the judge. These responses are histrionic and misinformed.

▲

FireBeyond a day ago | parent [-]

Appeals are not automatic. Another judge has to decide whether you have standing to appeal - you can't just say "don't like the result, redo!"

	▲	zdragnar a day ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Right, there needs to be procedural grounds for appeal, and this case is entirely about the judge violating procedural rules by delegating away their judgement. It's a perfect example of a case for an appeals court.
	▲	freejazz 11 minutes ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		Yes, and? Lawsuits aren't automatic and you can't just say "don't like the result, redo!" in them either.
	▲	AngryData a day ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Doesn't seem that way for people with money though.