| ▲ | tempaccount420 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
Why haven't we all moved off GitHub yet? Or let me ask a more useful question: if we were to move, then to where? Ideally somewhere new (not Gitlab) | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ndriscoll 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Ideally something like IPNS to have a mutable ref based on (repo, pubkey, branch) to resolve a commit hash, a DHT for who has what commit hashes, and then just p2p transfers. You could still have a github or gitlab for issues and CI, but code (and maybe issues) could all be p2p like git is already designed for. Your forge could also act as a peer for code cloning, of course. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ShinyLeftPad 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Who's we? Your company? Otherwise there's no "we", Git is decentralized. Everyone can use whatever they want. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | duxup 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
For us the uptime issues have been annoying but not consequential enough to justify the work / risk of moving. I suspect even poor uptime for many services is a cosmetic problem for most users. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | mrkaye97 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I think the clear reason is even with their unreliability, the cost of migrating off of GitHub for _most_ places is not worth it, and so companies don't / won't (yet) | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | datakan 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Its hard to get lemmings to change course. | |||||||||||||||||