| ▲ | amazingamazing 7 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Why so much emphasis on Flock here? In manhattan i feel virtually every place has cameras. You will be hard pressed to find a block without them. What’s stopping a company from paying these people for their footage in return for “safety”? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ChoGGi 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I have cameras on my house; I asked my neighbours if they were okay with them beforehand. They're local storage only, no net access. I got them after my garage was broken into the second time. It's been a few years, haven't had a third break-in yet. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hilariously 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Not much, but a decentralized system is often hard to exploit, and we're reaching points where we've established the surveillance state the populace is finally understanding the repercussions in a clear and poignant way. Assume that means the public camera technology in general will be called Flock cameras, and people will have a more default negative reaction going forward. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | close04 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
A network of cameras where everything they record everywhere is logged and searchable is exponentially more powerful and dangerous that a patchwork of individual, unrelated cameras. > What’s stopping a company from paying these people for their footage in return for “safety”? The complexity of dealing with 1000 different relationships, with individual contracts, negotiations, prices, etc. to collect the information, and then building a platform on which to make that information available to customers. | |||||||||||||||||||||||