| ▲ | glimshe 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
Not disagreeing with you, but adding to my argument. Despite the human handholding, I feel that 3 years would have been enough for 18 months of thinking about the product plus 18 months where a team could get 3-5 years worth of coding/development done. Yet, we haven't seen anything big yet, like a new Youtube/Instragram, an amazing videogame, a major cure etc. Maybe they are coming, but every day that passes is an indication that the net productivity positive of the technology isn't as big as advertised. In my own personal use of AI, I experienced a 30-50% increase in productivity, but no more than that. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | lukeschlather 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
It's only been at most the past year where AI has been unambiguously helpful and not a hindrance. 3 years ago it gave the appearance of being helpful but it tended to be more of a hindrance. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | nacozarina 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
perhaps being 30-50% ‘busier’ is something quite different from being 30-50% more ‘productive’ and ppl are just bad at detecting the difference | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||