Why the comment submitted by jacquesm, who posted the link and it's not exactly an anonymous poster, that said "Apologies for linking to X but this is worth reading." has been flagged to death??

▲

defrost 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Vouched. (A few more might resurrect it)

▲

coldtea 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Maybe because "apologies for linking to X" is needless gaudy virtue signalling.

Make it "Apologies for linking to Amodei" and we're talking.

▲

dyauspitr an hour ago | parent [-]

Just seems like virtue to me.

	▲	42 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		[deleted]

▲

isoprophlex 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

i was about to post the same thing. i vouched for the comment, but it's too dead to recover from my single vouching action.

▲

eru 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You can 'vouch' for a comment, if you think it shouldn't be flagged.

▲

darkwater 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I'm more interested in why somebody would suddenly flag that post. It's not spam, bot, offensive or anything else. Maybe you could downvote it if you don't like the take on X - it still would be childish but at least would be proportionate.

	▲	sscaryterry an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Why? I'm sure there are plenty of Anthropic employees on here...

▲

raverbashing 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

This site's audience has been less of the technical curious kind and more of the pathological misalignment one