Linear Algebra Done Right

hollowturtle an hour ago | parent | next [-]

For those who find Linear Algebra Done Right too much to start with, and those who don't get why Strang starts with matrices, I can't recommend more "The dark art of linear algebra" read this first. With this you can then tackle every other book on the topic more easily

▲

emil-lp an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Previously on Hacker News:

Linear Algebra Done Right 58 points, July 2023, 4 comments https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36576114

Linear Algebra Done Right – 4th Edition, 631 points, Oct 2023, 294 comments https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38060159

Linear Algebra Done Right [pdf], 85 points, Sept 2024, 39 comments https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41416799

	▲	h_mirin an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Previously in my ~/Downloads: linear_algebra_done_right.pdf, 0 pages read, July 2023 linear_algebra_done_right (1).pdf, 0 pages read, Oct 2023 linear_algebra_done_right (2).pdf, 0 pages read, Sept 2024 Downloading (3) now.

▲

wodenokoto an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Last night I was looking into what to read after or along with 3Blue1Brown's series of Linear algebra videos [1]

The contenders seems to be:

- Linear Algebra Done Right - Sheldon Axler

- Liner Algebra Done Wrong - Sergei Treil

- Introduction to Linea Algebra - Gilbert Strang

- Introduction to Applied Linear Algebra: Vectors, Matrices, and Least Squares by Stephen Boyd and Lieven Vandenberghe

[1] https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZHQObOWTQDPD3MizzM2x...

▲

ivankra 11 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

If you liked 3B1B and prefer intuition/applications-heavy view, then definitely Strang over Axler. Check out especially his newer textbook "Linear Algebra and Learning from Data".

Axler is more of a pure math textbook - if you want to dive more into proofs and abstractions.

▲

geokon 11 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I really recommend Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra by Carl Meyer. It's both concise and comprehensive. Strange is very good, but feels kinda vague and long winded in comparison (very good for a high level understanding of the tools you're dealing with)

▲

dash2 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Strang is simpler and clearer. Axler is more advanced in the sense that it doesn’t tie it to matrices. Strange is a “first course” book, Axler is a second course.

	▲	aureate 28 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Depends how you think. I found Strang impenetrable and Axler simple and lucid. Some people seem to find abstract vector spaces weird and unmotivated without doing a load of stuff with lists and grids of numbers first. I find determinants weird and unmotivated without learning exterior algebra first. I wish Axler had been my first course.
	▲	Tomte 35 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Axler does limit itself to vector spaces over real and complex fields, though. That‘s fine, but I would have appreciated notices, which proofs and theorems do not hold in the general case. It‘s an exercise for the reader.

▲

qsort 21 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You zoomers are making a list of linear algebra books and not citing Lang? Get off my lawn ;)

▲

impossiblefork an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Lorenzo Sadun's Linear Algebra: The Decoupling Principle would probably be enough too if you added something about determinants.

▲

emil-lp an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

+1 for Strang.

▲

quailfarmer 23 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

+1 for Boyd

▲

dipanshuhappy 29 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Lately been deep diving into linear algebra. And a way which i engage with it is that I tell AI to generate interactive examples + questions on Lean or Haskell. Its so fun, just deriving the intuition in these languages.

▲

contubernio 36 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Overrated and tendentious book. There are many better linear algebra texts. His polemic against determinants is poorly motivated, misguided, and distracting. The writing is quite formal and not terribly inspiring. The coverage is adequate but nothing more.

	▲	qsort 16 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> His polemic against determinants is poorly motivated, misguided, and distracting. What polemic? Defining the determinant as the unique multilinear alternating form satisfying certain properties is very normal (and in fact the only way that really makes sense for both finite- and infinite-dimensional vector spaces). There are zero unusual things with this book imo.
	▲	nuclearnicer 13 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Something else you recommend?

▲

Bimos 44 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I found it really insightful (and always overlooked) to distinguish between vector and co-vector spaces. It doesn't necessarily produce new knowledge, but makes things more clear.

▲

lokimedes 16 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

My bag of tricks is better than your bag of tricks. Alright.

As with most textbooks, it fails to motivate why reading it is worth the investment. Perhaps it is a millennial old tradition of the Greek mystery schools, that the rite of passage came by proving your commitment to material knowledge without anything but fate in the school itself as motivation.

Rigor before Worth.

(Yes this is a pet peeve of mine :)

▲

dhruv3006 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I passed the class just because of how good the book is.

▲

netfortius 30 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Kindle format link == 404

▲

fithisux an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

These days, linear algebra done right should be accompanied with some CAS to view how algorithms are used.

Possibly paired with some numerical algebra free text (many on the Internet)

▲

Tomte 34 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Do not get the latest edition, the layout and typesetting is atrocious!