| "Humanities" is literally on the list. As in, do not fund any Humanities research. Also not allowed to use "solar energy", "Geothermal energy", "EV infrastructure", "electrification", "Hydrogen energy". Welp, America, you either gotta kick this administration out, or enjoy cosplaying the 1800s. |
| |
| ▲ | red-iron-pine 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | they call it dept of war, and removing things like ethics from a discussion is how we ended up with a dept of war instead of defense how's that iran war thing going btw? | |
| ▲ | pseudohadamard 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The DoD has carried out a number of studies on mild traumatic brain injuries (MTBI), for obvious reasons. Not sure if the NSF keywords apply there but if they do then they can no longer do this work to help treat injured troops because it has the word evil word "traumatic" in it. | |
| ▲ | jaredklewis 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I mean if the DoD thought the projects were worthwhile to begin with, yes, I think it is eyebrow raising to cancel grants based on a keyword search for "solar energy," "hydrogen energy," "electrification," or "geothermal energy." That the administration thinks these terms signify "wokeness" or whatever is depressing. Not difficult to imagine research grants with military applications using these words. Follow the war in Ukraine much? Energy infrastructure is frequently in the headlines. |
|
| |
| ▲ | CGMthrowaway 14 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | GDP growth was consistently higher in the 19th century, prior to the Fed, income tax, welfare and all the rest. Imagine what we could do with today's technology https://economistonline.mogaocap.com/2013/02/03/us-economic-... (this is sarcasm, by the way) | |
| ▲ | selfhoster1312 a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | My understanding is at least a portion of the people who voted for Trump did not vote for reactionary fascism, but for what he publicly said/says he'll stand for: standing up for the little guy against ruling elites, stopping imperialist wars, boosting the economy and giving people the famous "tariff checks", etc. Of course he's done exactly the opposite (and more!), but it's hard to see that when we're being brainwashed by billionaire-owned media. Just like it's hard to see why the Democrats are just another corporate scam to profit the wealthy classes when we're being brainwashed by opposite-side billionaire-owned media. I don't have a lot of faith or trust in the Democratic Socialists of America, but they might well unite most of the people (including Harris and Trump supporters) in common goals: healthcare for all, living wages, affordable housing, stopping the AI bubble and techno-fascism, etc. Basic stuff that's supported by most of the population yet despised by elected representatives from both parties. | | |
| ▲ | JeremyNT 21 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | They could use ignorance as an excuse the first time, but only those who were too young to see the first term can use it now. One of the failures of the US media is to continue allowing these voters to hide behind such plausible deniability. They knew what they were asking for and they need to be understood as people who wanted this outcome. | | |
| ▲ | Forgeties79 19 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I was about to say, we are over a decade now into "the Trump show," any excuses about his outsider status or not knowing stuff is gone. Trump is the establishment. These people voted for The Man and his plans. Then when we say "look what he did" (assuming they can even acknowledge a critique is valid) they go "well you made us vote for him." I swear I'll lose it if another Romney-Republican who believes this is a blip or whatever shares me yet another Peggy Noonan piece. It's ridiculous. No responsibility taken. | | |
| ▲ | brayhite 16 hours ago | parent [-] | | It’s futile to rationalize a cult without acknowledging it’s a cult. The pundits who don’t are grifting or part of the cult themselves. | | |
| ▲ | CGMthrowaway 14 hours ago | parent [-] | | People said the same thing about Obama (cult of personality), who was also elected for a second term despite a number of big broken promises, including closing Guantanamo Bay, cutting the national deficit, passing cap and trade, creating a public health insurance option in the ACA, comprehensive immigration reform, and fostering bipartisanship | | |
| ▲ | Forgeties79 14 hours ago | parent [-] | | If you want to compare Obama and Trump insofar as “presidents generally don’t do 90% of what they say” that is valid but to imply their admins are/were anything alike beyond that would be ridiculous. I’m assuming that’s not what you mean but I just need to throw that out there. The only other obvious comparison is the typical expansion of executive power we’ve (unfortunately) come to expect, though like the previous comparison, with Trump it’s different by orders of magnitude. | | |
| ▲ | CGMthrowaway 14 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | >If you want to compare Obama and Trump insofar as “presidents generally don’t do 90% of what they say” that is valid but to imply their admins are/were anything alike beyond that would be ridiculous. I’m assuming that’s not what you mean but I just need to throw that out there. Yes you're right, I absolutely did not mean to imply that. I just forgot to say "orange man bad" as a signoff. Thanks | | | |
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
| |
| ▲ | preg_match 20 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Trump was, and is, very explicit about his hatred of science, research, and the entire left in general. He ran on discrediting anyone who was slightly left leaning. Oh, it’s all fake news, Fauci is a murderer, etc. So no, they knew, they just didn’t care. Or thought he was lying. Why would you ever vote for someone under the hope they’re lying? I don’t know, but they did. That’s, like, trump defense 101. He’s a liar, and somehow that makes him good? Shh shh shh… don’t question it too much. Really all Americans want the same things, the things you’ve listed and more. The problem is the republicans would sooner die than give us any of that. In my state, the republicans have spent the last decade systematically destroying public school. You see public school is free, so we can’t have that. They’d rather fuck over hundreds of thousands of children’s futures than give poor people free education. It’s all about fucking over the poor, the black, the gay, the immigrants. Anyone else caught in that line of fire is collateral damage. Oops! | | |
| ▲ | Forgeties79 19 hours ago | parent [-] | | He also ran on releasing the Epstein files, let's make sure to remind folks of that at every turn. "The most transparent" president. |
| |
| ▲ | red-iron-pine 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > My understanding is at least a portion of the people who voted for Trump did not vote for reactionary fascism, but for what he publicly said/says he'll stand for: standing up for the little guy against ruling elites, stopping imperialist wars, boosting the economy and giving people the famous "tariff checks", etc. these people are either rubes, or else they heard the subtle dog whistles that implied other things, and thought the wink wink was for them and not the billionaire class. |
|
|
