|
| ▲ | tim333 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| The US mainland won't get attacked but places the US wants to protect like Israel already are. |
|
| ▲ | EliRivers 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I suspect but cannot prove that a lot of the issues the US is experiencing right now exerting itself around the globe, such as lack of regional logistics ports and long supply lines and less enthusiasm from allies to join in, would apply in spades to anyone who decided to have a serious pop at the continental USA (barring globe-spanning nuclear missiles, but nobody wants to start that war right now). Looking like a big man in your near waters, no more than a few days away from a home port, is one achievement (and it is an achievement - many nations can't do this). Sustaining a war on the other side of a serious ocean or two is a game very few countries in the world can manage right now. The US would look extraordinarily strong to anyone bringing a war to the US. |
|
| ▲ | perilunar 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The US is not about to be attacked. But your allies are getting sick of your bullying and hypocrisy. Without allies you won't keep your overseas bases, and without those you cease to be able to project power and maintain global dominance. |
|
| ▲ | winrid 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Our nuclear subs alone are a significant deterrent (as long as people think you'll use them). |
| |
| ▲ | defrost 17 hours ago | parent [-] | | To be honest, they're getting a bit old, they need to be replaced, and underneath the brave face the shipyards and staffing levels are challenged: https://www.buildsubmarines.com/mission Probably all good in the long run, unless POTUS has a 3 am on the gilt toilet moment and declares they all need to be steam powered and have their conning towers moved. ( see: Ford class carriers ) |
|
|
| ▲ | conception 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| No, but private conversations between China and Taiwan right now are probably… tense. Korea as well this week. |
| |
| ▲ | tonyedgecombe 16 hours ago | parent [-] | | If they had any sense China would be looking at Ukraine and Iran and conclude that it isn't a good idea to invade Taiwan. | | |
| ▲ | wahern 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Iran isn't an invasion. It's just lobbing some missiles hoping they'll cry uncle, which has worked approximately never. It says nothing about the ability of Iran to resist an invasion. Russia has 3x the population of Ukraine. China has over 56x Taiwan's population. Invading an island nation like Taiwan wouldn't be easy, but I'm guessing China's takeaway from the Ukraine War and Iran War is that they can win pretty quickly as long as they strike hard, fast, with overwhelming force, and start invading by sea and air immediately and continuously. They'd lose many people initially (though relative to their population, maybe not enough to break their stride), but victory only requires commitment on China's part. They're already building a fleet of specially developed landing ships: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/20/china-landing-... The only thing that could possibly save Taiwan is American intervention. But Iran has shown the US has zero interest in shedding it's own blood in open combat even to win a war it started. And in his first term there were claims Trump admitted privately he wouldn't actually save Taiwan if China invaded. | | |
| ▲ | Zigurd 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The relative manpower advantage Russia appears to have is smaller than the raw numbers indicate. Russia can't abandon the far east and China has a lot of motivation to mess around. Russia's border with NATO dramatically expanded since invading Ukraine. They also need to keep Belarus in line. | |
| ▲ | tonyedgecombe 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I thought the same about Russia when they invaded Ukraine. It turned out I was wrong. |
| |
| ▲ | k12sosse 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | China will take Taiwan and a shot won't even be fired. Why? Because China is not America, they will do the hard work. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | nacozarina 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| far simpler to watch US self-destruct than to attack |
| |
| ▲ | noir_lord 14 hours ago | parent [-] | | Not just that it is also strategically smart, if you are a geopolitical rival of the United States the absolute last thing you want to do is be the external aggressor that unifies them again (if temporarily). Far better to just sit back and watch them blunder from unforced error to unforced error while you quietly achieve whatever your long term goals are. | | |
| ▲ | iAMkenough 13 hours ago | parent [-] | | While they’re sitting back, they might as well buy into the open corruption to serve their own interests like never before. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | georgemcbay 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > are we about to get attacked? Nah. Not because we aren't relatively weak right now (because we are), but because there isn't another world power that has the motive and desire to attack us at this time despite our being weak. All of the US-Sino saber rattling comes from the US, not China. China is more than happy to just sit back and watch the US empire fall from the inside out entirely through the incompetence of our own leadership. |
|
| ▲ | justsomehnguy 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Sorry? Look at the map. USA has the best position in the world with a literal oceans as a natural defenses. |
| |