[flagged]

macintux a day ago | parent | next [-]

Do not “both sides” this level of corruption and incompetence.

mrtesthah a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Following the law is not a matter of partisan politics.

Sure it is — see the Democrats refusing to stop discriminating based on protected class, despite that being illegal.

Quotas, affirmative action, and now DIE have all been ruled illegal bigotry by the US Supreme Court, but Democrats can’t and won’t stop being bigots.

I can’t take a party who has flouted civil rights laws my entire lifetime whining about “muh rule of law!” seriously.

Where are these quotas?

	▲	zmgsabst 20 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Quotas were rules illegal in 1978. I listed them as one of a sequence of continued (and later ruled illegal) bigoted practices, over time. > 1978 — Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) — The UC Davis School of Medicine admissions program violated the Equal Protection Clause with the institution of quotas for underrepresented minorities. However, Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr.'s concurring opinion deemed diversity in higher education a "compelling interest" and held that race could be one of the factors in university admissions. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_action_in_the_Unit...

ajross a day ago | parent | prev [-]

What's the counterexample of significant funding withdrawn by democratic administrations because of "possibly conservative" language in the output?

"Tone deaf" seems not to be capturing the essence of the malfeasance here.

	▲	rightbyte a day ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I think it is some sort of whataboutism without any regard to proportions. Some people have a really hard time emotionally dealing with systems that occusionally fail.
	▲	zmgsabst a day ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		They refused to give money unless your application included a section explaining how you supported Democrat social ideology, during the Biden administration. So called DIE-statements.