Remix.run Logo
piloto_ciego 15 hours ago

Man, I see this stuff, and I think, "my god! think of the opportunity we have to replace the current economic system with something where we're not all in a fierce knife fight to try to stay employed so we don't starve!"

We have to stop fearing the machines and start fearing the firmware running on our brains! It's capitalism that's the problem, not the robots... if anything the robots can liberate us from capital's death grip!

trescenzi 15 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If Dario was up there preaching about replacing today with Star Trek I think people wouldn’t hate it. Everything those at the head of this project say amounts to the current state except abject poverty for everyone but them. When Dario donates his share in Anthropic to fight hunger I’ll consider being optimistic that capital is going anywhere.

Yizahi 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Please correct me if I'm wrong, I'm no trekkie myself, but isn't Star Trek timeline starts with a series or world wars in 21st century which results in a nuclear holocaust and a big fraction of planet inhabitants exterminated? Doesn't sound very enticing honestly :)

digitaltrees 37 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Its not capitalism thats the problem, its that monopolies and capital concentration destroy capitalism, and we have let monopolies and capital concentration run uncheck for several generations. A capitalist system would be only small local businesses, no walmarts, no Tyson chicken, no google, when you have 1000s of small producers competing the price setting function of a market actually works, and the wealth is distributed among all the producers rather than the Walton family.

skupig 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>replace the current economic system with something where we're not all in a fierce knife fight to try to stay employed

Jobs will become even more scarce, so how does that follow?

>robots can liberate us from capital's death grip

We are already live in a world sufficiently technologically advanced to feed and house everyone, and yet we don't.

grebc 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It’s amusing to imagine the oligarchs are going to anymore charitable than currently.

piloto_ciego 15 hours ago | parent | next [-]

They don't have to be charitable.

We can literally take it from them. I get why people don't like to think about that sort of thing, but... yeah. We could make AI a sort of public good and do something like the Permanent Fund Dividend or something. There's lots of options even in the "reformist" way of thinking about it. But we shouldn't be naive.

inigyou 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You can't use HN to advocate for violent uprising.

archagon 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes, you must launder any advocacy for violence through the use of neutral language like “defense industry,” which has wide support and even VC funding around here.

digitaltrees 33 minutes ago | parent [-]

Did you ever stop to think why that shift has happened? if you want to stop mass objection to oppressing a population owning drone company is a good portfolio asset.

grebc 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Oh yeah don’t be naive, but we’ll just take what we want. Ok bro.

digitaltrees 32 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

There werent drones and palintir and flock. Protesters were just sentenced to 50 years in prison.

piloto_ciego 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I mean, we've done it before lol

SR2Z 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It's not their choice, no matter how much they'd like it to be.

The Chinese models are able to distill outputs into a model of slightly worse performance within a few weeks of each release, and the same copyright exemptions which protect these guys scraping also protect China.

As long as their lobbyists don't win (and the deck is stacked against them, make no mistake) the future of AI is not going to be owned by the frontier labs.

10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]