I last touched formal verification methods 20 years ago. Back then, Coq had the capacity to automatically transform your proof into OCaml. I would have expected that this would have only gotten better with time.

▲

djsjajah 4 hours ago | parent [-]

It’s been renamed recently. Maybe a few times. I think it’s rocq now. [1]

[1] https://rocq-prover.org/docs

	▲	Nail2680 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Huh, I missed all of that. The linked discussion about the renaming from your link was a bit odd: https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/t/coq-community-survey-202... It seemed to me from the survey that most people didn't want it changed or didn't care, but due to anglophone users they decided to change it anyway.