wBlock by an MIT student is open source and seems (just!) about as trustworthy as uBlock, though of course without the track record. Light & fast, especially to update.

  “wBlock runs entirely within Safari's content blocking API. There's no data collection, no tracking, and no system-level extensions that can monitor your browsing.“

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/wblock/id6746388723 / GH: https://github.com/0xCUB3/wBlock

On AdGuard: can act as your PiHole and allow you to see network requests when run in non-native mode.

▲ NetOpWibby 6 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Never heard of this but looks good to me. Nice to have another tool for the arsenal.

▲ armadyl 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Nice, last time I heard about wblock felt like years ago and I'm not sure why I didn't consider it.

These days I don't run on-device adblock, I just do DNS filtering for the most part but I'll check it out, not sure I wanna keep tunneling all my DNS queries to ControlD perpetually lol

▲ tyre an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

No offense to the author, but I don't trust a college kid the same way I trust the team behind uBlock. The latter have a well-established track record with substantial external eyes (including Firefox directly.)

	▲	NetOpWibby 6 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Age of author shouldn’t be of relevance. Experience and/or team size should. A kid reading up on security from age 6 through college could have a decade of experience, for example.

▲ mmooss 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Just a comment on the narrative:

> wBlock by an MIT student is open source

It's funny to me that some find that narrative appealing.

Here's another narrative: Many of those MIT students go on to be SV founders and employees who build, operate, and make millions or billions from the mass surveillance and ad industry. And I'm sure some participated in FOSS in college - what better way to build your resume for the surveillance/ad industry?

(I'm not commenting on the wBlock developer; I think all such narratives are deceiving and should be ignored.)

	▲	yesb 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The "narrative" above is that they're both made by seemingly well-intentioned solo developers, that's it. Use your own judgement for something that wants to inject JS into every website you visit.

▲ Aboutplants 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Thanks for the link, I like it so far