| ▲ | ivan_gammel 5 hours ago |
| This doesn‘t sound like AI. LLMs do not use dictionary definitions for translating a paper this way. It does look like some translation engine like Google Translate or worse, maybe with some text obfuscator trying to avoid plagiarism detection. |
|
| ▲ | userbinator 11 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| Yes, this looks like something which predates AI by several decades: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_spinning |
| |
| ▲ | duskwuff 4 minutes ago | parent [-] | | That's my theory as well - and I suspect that, somewhere, there's a configuration file that the fraudsters are sharing. It's the simplest possible explanation for why certain tortured phrases show up so often. |
|
|
| ▲ | wavemode 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| LLMs are not the only form of AI. |
| |
| ▲ | anamexis 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Simple substitution of phrases doesn’t sound like any AI. | | |
| ▲ | xgulfie 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Autocorrect unleashed doesn't sound like any AI either but that doesn't stop anyone from calling it that |
|
|
|
| ▲ | 1over137 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Google Translate uses an LLM, last I heard. |
| |
|
| ▲ | gmerc 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| That sounds like Anthrophics watermark explanation though. |
| |
| ▲ | LPisGood 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Anthropic’s watermark is just using a known collection of random seeds during output token generation. That’s it. The models always relied on some randomness, here the randomness is fixed and remembered for querying later. |
|