|
| ▲ | dash2 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Isn't it more likely to be changing words to disguise plagiarism? Update: looking at some of these, I think it is probably just poor machine translation. |
| |
| ▲ | Molitor5901 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Yeah some kind of translation issue. The papers seem to know what they're talking about, and I don't entirely get the AI gut feeling, only on the key words. | |
| ▲ | Molitor5901 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Good point, but I see lots of articles are using this "kidney disappointment" so maybe but.. holy toledo look at Impacts of Renal Transplantation and its Mental (2023) by Renan Kamath : “organ disillusionment,” “kidney relocate dismissal,” and “excusal of the moved organ.” | | |
| ▲ | dash2 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | "waste can build to exorbitant level inside the blood, which harms both
kidney and closures in kicking the bucket... " "Regularly, it's more irritating than it is not kidding..." (Pal and Gautam 2018) | |
| ▲ | flexagoon 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Its like when you write a school essay and look up every second word in a thesaurus thinking it makes the essay better |
|
|
|
| ▲ | Molitor5901 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Interesting! I started reading and there are so many sentences like “gauges an individual's gamble of kidney disappointment.” Changing words for watermarking .. I understand why it may do that .. but .. what an unfortunate choice of where to do it. |
| |
| ▲ | TheOtherHobbes 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | The substitutions are transparent and don't change the meaning. What can possible go incorrectly? | | |
|
