The writing here seems very odd. It reads like a product announcement or blog page, not an article in Nature. I'm left questioning its validity.

▲

pama 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Hmm. I didn’t get that impression from a quick skim. Just curious: what makes you think that?

▲

kzrdude 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I would guess it's the 'vast' and the 'unprecedented' for example.

▲

gestalt1 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Maybe just a combination of academic jargon and English not being the authors first language? At this point I would also not be surprised if language models are used for writing abstracts.

▲

p-e-w an hour ago | parent [-]

This is Nature. If they stopped doing editorial work regarding writing style, and use LLMs to generate abstracts, it seems they have outlived their usefulness.

	▲	lazide 9 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		New here?

▲

ironqcold 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I noticed that too.The writing style itself seems a bit strange. I'm not deep into superconductors, so I can't judge the science itself but I have doubts about how much trust this article can give.