There is no evidence either small quantities of tobacco or most drugs harm you either.

People that want to drink will find excuses to do so.

Maybe — I haven't looked at the evidence.

But, alcohol is something that has been present in our ancestral environment (e.g. fermented fruits). If anyone's telling me, our bodies didn't learn to at least tolerate small amounts of it without any major side effects, I'm going to be asking a lot of follow-up questions.

I think it's much easier to argue this case than, say, tobacco or "drugs", which are arguably more recent inventions, depending on your exact definition of drug.

	▲	Ekaros an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Same logic applies to heavy metal like lead and others. Also cyanide and arsenic. And so on. We still actively avoid them. Just because we can tolerate them via various process does not mean it wouldn't be better to avoid them altogether and minimise exposure.
	▲	epolanski an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Smoked meat has been a staple of human diet for millenia. It's cancerous.

▲

graemep an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Which "drugs"?

The problem with highly addictive things is people do not stop at small quantities.

	▲	epolanski an hour ago \| parent [-]
		If alcohol was invented today, people would be like "no way we allow a juice that makes you happy, stupid, aggressive and endangers yourself and others and has high addictive levels".